Medical marijuana could appear on 2018 ballot


Last update: February 23, 2018


New Approach South Dakota circulated two petitions, one to enact a law to legalize and regulate medical cannabis, which was submitted to the secretary of state by the November 2017 deadline, and one to legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana for adult use, which failed to gather enough signatures to appear on the ballot.

The medical marijuana petition garnered around 15,000 signatures, greater than the 13,871 valid signatures required. Now the secretary of state must check the validity of a sample of the signatures to determine if enough of them are valid and the measure can appear on the ballot.


South Dakota allows controlled access to cannabidiol


South Dakota passed legislation (Senate Bill 95) removing cannabidiol (CBD oil) from the definition of marijuana and making it a Schedule IV controlled substance. Unfortunately, the bill signed by Gov. Dennis Daugaard in March 2017 included a requirement that any recommended CBD oil be approved by the Food and Drug Administration, which delayed relief for patients. (A House committee had approved a version of the bill that would have eliminated the FDA approval requirement.)

Qualifying patients may eventually be able to get some relief, because the FDA is currently reviewing Epidiolex, a nearly pure extract of cannabidiol, which has undergone clinical trials for Lennox-Gastaut and Dravet Syndromes, types of epilepsy. The drug could be available later in 2018. Unfortunately, this will not help patients who need some THC in order to get relief for their symptoms, so an effective medical marijuana program is still needed.

Please ask your legislators to support compassionate access to medical marijuana for seriously ill South Dakotans.

South Dakota marijuana possession laws may be the nation’s harshest

Possession of just a small amount of marijuana in the state carries a potential penalty of a year in jail and a $2,000 fine. Even more alarmingly, individuals who have consumed marijuana elsewhere are also subject to this penalty if they test positive for past use — even if they consumed marijuana in a state where it was legal. South Dakota appears to be the only state with such an “internal possession” law. In addition, possession of any amount of hash or concentrates is a felony, punishable by up to five years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000. Even just possessing drug paraphernalia, like a marijuana pipe, in South Dakota can land you a misdemeanor charge, up to 30 days in prison, and up to a $500 fine.

A study by the American Civil Liberties Union found that South Dakota was among the top 10 states for racial disparity in marijuana possession arrest rates. Despite people of all races using marijuana at very similar rates, blacks in South Dakota are nearly 4.8 times more likely than whites to be arrested for marijuana possession.

In 2017, 15 lawmakers introduced Senate Bill 129, which would have revised the penalty for ingestion of marijuana and undone the uniquely severe law of criminalizing internal possession. Unfortunately, the bill did not make it out of committee. No marijuana policy reform bills were introduced in 2018.

Click here to ask your legislators to treat marijuana possession as civil offense, eliminating jail time for adults who choose to use a substance that is safer than alcohol and the life-changing collateral consequences triggered by a criminal conviction.

Timeline of marijuana reform in South Dakota

1977: During a short-lived wave of decriminalization in the country, South Dakota decriminalized cannabis, but repealed that law “almost immediately” afterward.

2003: In South Dakota v. Matthew Ducheneaux, the state Supreme Court ruled that Mr. Ducheneaux — who was convicted of marijuana possession in 2000 — could not rely on a state necessity defense law that allows illegal conduct when a person is being threatened by unlawful force. The court stated that it would strain the language of the law if it could be used to show that a health problem amounts to unlawful force against a person.

2006: The South Dakota Medical Marijuana Initiative, also known as Initiative 4, was on the November 2006 ballot in South Dakota as an initiated state statute, where it was defeated by a vote of 52-47%. The measure would have allowed persons, including minors with parental consent, with a debilitating medical condition to be certified to grow up to six marijuana plants, possess up to one ounce, and use small amounts of marijuana for medical purposes.

2010: The South Dakota Medical Marijuana Initiative, also known as Initiative 13, was on the November 2010 ballot in South Dakota as an initiated state statute, where it was defeated by a percentage of 63-36%. The measure would have legalized the possession, use, distribution, and cultivation of marijuana by persons registered with the South Dakota Department of Health.

2016: The South Dakota Medical Marijuana Initiative did not make the 2016 ballot in South Dakota as an initiated state statute. The measure would have legalized medical marijuana in South Dakota.

2017: The South Dakota State Senate passed legislation removing cannabidiol from the definition of marijuana and making it a Schedule IV controlled substance and legal to use so long as any recommended CBD oil is approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

Stay connected


Thank you for supporting the Marijuana Policy Project. If you have not already, please subscribe to our alerts to stay up-to-date on the status of marijuana policy reform in South Dakota.