Medical Cannabis Laws and Practitioner Protections
The vast majority of medical cannabis states provide explicit protections for health care providers who issue written certifications or recommend cannabis. Most of these laws are strikingly similar to LB 933, explicitly providing that practitioners cannot be subjected to any penalty, including arrest, prosecution, or disciplinary proceeding, or denial of any right or privilege for recommending medical cannabis. Some include exceptions for if the doctor violates the standard of care.
Only Nebraska and Vermont lack explicit legal protections for certifying health care practitioners. Nebraska’s law was enacted by voters after the state Supreme Court ruled that a 2020 effort was multiple subjects. Protections were likely omitted to avoid risking a similar ruling.
Vermont had legal protections in its original medical cannabis law. However, when the law was re-codified to combine it with adult-use legalization, the provision appears to have been inadvertently omitted. That said, Vermont also doesn’t rely on doctors recommending cannabis, they simply state that the patient has a qualifying condition.
Medical-Only State?
Practitioner Protections?
Citation
Alabama
Yes
Yes
Ala. Code § 20-2A-7 (a)
Alaska
No, adult-use, too
Yes
A.S. § 17.37.030 (c)
Arizona
No, adult-use, too
Yes
A.R.S. § 36-2811 (C.)
Arkansas
Yes
Yes
Ark. Const. Amend. 98, § 15 (h)(1)
California
No, adult-use, too
Yes
Cal.Health & Safety Code § 11362.5 (c)
Colorado
No, adult-use, too
Yes
C.R.S.A. Const. Art. 18, § 14 (c)
Connecticut
No, adult-use, too
Yes
C.G.S.A. § 21a-408c
Delaware
No, adult-use, too
Yes
16 Del.C. § 4903A
Florida
Yes
Yes
Florida Const. Article X, § 29 (a)(2)
Georgia
Yes, low-THC state
Yes
Ga. Code Ann., § 16-12-231
Hawaii
Yes
Yes
HRS § 329-126
Illinois
No, adult-use, too
Yes
410 ILCS 130/25
Iowa
Yes, low-THC state
Yes
I.C.A. § 124E.12
Kentucky
Yes
Yes
KRS § 218B.015 (d)
Louisiana
Yes
They “may recommend”
LSA-R.S. § 40:1046
Maine
No, adult-use, too
They “may” provide certifications
M.R.S.A. § 2423-B
Maryland
No, adult-use, too
Yes
MD Code, Alcoholic Beverages and Cannabis, § 36-1201
Massachusetts
No, adult-use, too
Yes
M.G.L.A. 94I § 2
Michigan
No, adult-use, too
Yes
M.C.L.A. 333.26424
Minnesota
No, adult-use, too
Yes
M.S.A. § 342.57
Mississippi
Yes
Yes, “is allowed”
Miss. Code Ann. § 41-137-9 (2)(d)
Missouri
No, adult-use, too
Yes
Mo. Const. Art. XIV § 1(5)
Montana
No, adult-use, too
Yes
MCA § 16-12-515
Nebraska
Yes
No
N/A
Nevada
No, adult-use, too
Yes
N.R.S. § 678C.650
New Hampshire
Yes
Yes
N.H. Rev. Stat. § 126-X:2
New Jersey
No, adult-use, too
Yes
N.J.S.A.§ 24:6I-6
New Mexico
No, adult-use, too
Yes
N. M. S. A., § 26-2B-4
New York
No, adult-use, too
Yes
McKinney's Public Health Law § 3369
North Dakota
Yes
Yes
NDCC, § 19-24.1-32 (10)
Ohio
No, adult-use, too
Yes
R.C. § 3780.33
Oklahoma
Yes
Yes
63 Okl.St.Ann. § 427.10
Oregon
No, adult-use, too
Yes
O.R.S. § 475C.891
Penn.
Yes
Yes
35 P.S. § 10231.2103 (a)(3)
Rhode Island
No, adult-use, too
Yes
RI G.L., § 21-28.6-4 (k)
Texas
Yes
They “may” prescribe
V.T.C.A., Occupations Code § 169.003
South Dakota
Yes
Yes
SDCL § 34-20G-5
Utah
Yes
Yes
Utah Code § 26B-4-20
Vermont
No, adult-use, too
Not currently?
Previously, 18 VSA 4476b. Appears to have been mistakenly omitted. Also, HCPs in VT simply say a patient has a qualifying condition.