Nevada Attorney General Condemns Drug Czar's "Excessive" and
"Disturbing" Interference in State's Marijuana Vote
| FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
APRIL 24, 2003 |
Nevada Attorney General Condemns Drug Czar's
"Excessive" and "Disturbing" Interference in State's Marijuana Vote
CARSON CITY, NEVADA -- In an opinion sent Wednesday to the Nevada
Secretary of State's office, Nevada Attorney General Brian Sandoval
sharply rebuked federal Drug Czar John Walters for "excessive" and
"disturbing" interference in the state's vote on the Marijuana Policy
Project's Nevada marijuana initiative, while at the same time declaring
that a court would "likely" find that Walters was immune from state
campaign finance laws.
Walters campaigned energetically
against the initiative, which would have replaced marijuana prohibition
with a system of regulation for adults, but did not file campaign
contribution or expenditure reports. After MPP complained, Nevada
Secretary of State Dean Heller wrote to Walters, director of the White
House Office of National Drug Control Policy, noting that Nevada law
requires "the reporting of contributions and expenses for every person
or group of persons organized formally or informally who advocates the
passage or defeat of a question or group of questions on the ballot at
any election." Walters claimed immunity as a federal official.
In his opinion, dated April 21,
Sandoval wrote, "It is unfortunate that a representative of the federal
government substantially intervened in a matter that was clearly a
State of Nevada issue. The excessive federal intervention that was
exhibited in this instance is particularly disturbing because it sought
to influence the outcome of a Nevada election." Nevertheless, citing an
1890 case called In re Neagle, Sandoval concluded that a court
would "likely" find Walters to be immune from state campaign finance
laws.
"The Attorney General's opinion was
not based on controlling precedent," commented MPP Director of
Government Relations Steve Fox. "While the Attorney General cited an
1890 U.S. Supreme Court decision about a crime committed by a federal
employee, a Supreme Court case 81 years later laid out the law
with respect to state regulation of federal employees. The court held
these regulations to be valid if they did not `frustrate the full
effectiveness of federal law.' Requiring the drug czar to file campaign
finance forms does not frustrate his purpose; he is free to campaign to
his heart's content. Asking the drug czar to file campaign finance
reports after campaigning in the state is no different than requiring
U.S. Postal Service employees to obey state and local traffic laws
while delivering mail.
"While Secretary of State Heller asked
for this opinion from the attorney general, he is not bound to follow
its erroneous legal conclusion," Fox said. "We trust he will act to
enforce Nevada law."
With 12,000 members nationwide, the
Marijuana Policy Project is the largest marijuana policy reform
organization in the United States. MPP works to minimize the harm
associated with marijuana -- both the consumption of marijuana and
the laws that are intended to prohibit such use. MPP believes that the
greatest harm associated with marijuana is imprisonment. To this end,
MPP focuses on removing criminal penalties for marijuana use, with a
particular emphasis on making marijuana medically available to
seriously ill people who have the approval of their doctors.
####
|